Supercapacitor-Based Power Backup Prevents Data Loss in RAID Systems

Linear Technology LTC3625 LTC4412 LTM4616

Jim Drew, Linear Technology

Design Note 487

Introduction

Redundant arrays of independent disks, or RAID, systems, by nature are designed to preserve data in the face of adverse circumstances. One example is power failure, thereby threatening data that is temporarily stored in volatile memory. To protect this data, many systems incorporate a battery-based power backup that supplies short-term power – enough watt-seconds for the RAID controller to write volatile data to nonvolatile memory. However, advances in flash memory performance such as DRAM density, lower power consumption and faster write time, in addition to technology improvements in supercapacitors such as lower ESR and higher capacitance per unit volume, have made it possible to replace the batteries in these systems with longer lasting, higher performance and “greener” supercapacitors. Figure 1 shows a supercapacitor-based power backup system using the LTC3625 supercapacitor charger, an automatic power crossover switch using the LTC4412 PowerPath™ controller and an LTM4616 dual output μModule® DC/DC converter.

Supercapacitor-Based Power Backup Prevents Data Loss in RAID Systems
Figure 1. Supercapacitor Energy Storage System for Data Backup.

The LTC3625 is a high efficiency supercapacitor charger ideal for small profile backup in RAID applications. It comes in a 3 mm × 4 mm × 0.75 mm 12-lead DFN package and requires few external components. It features a programmable average charge current up to 1 A, automatic cell voltage balancing of two series-connected supercapacitors and a low current state that draws less than 1 μA from the supercapacitors.

Backup Power Applications

An effective power backup system incorporates a supercapacitor stack that has the capacity to support a complete data transfer. A DC/DC converter takes the output of the supercapacitor stack and provides a constant voltage to the data recovery electronics. Data transfer must be completed before the voltage across the supercapacitor stack drops to the minimum input operating voltage (VUV) of the DC/DC converter.

To estimate the minimum capacitance of the supercapacitor stack, the effective circuit resistance (RT) needs to be determined. RT is the sum of the ESR of the supercapacitors, distribution losses (RDIST) and the RDS(ON) of the automatic crossover’s MOSFETs:

Allowing 10% of the input power to be lost in RT at VUV, RT(MAX) may be determined:

The voltage required across the supercapacitor stack (VC(UV)) at VUV:

The minimum capacitance (CMIN) requirement can now be calculated based on the required backup time (tBU) to transfer data into the flash memory, the initial stack voltage (VC(O)) and (VC(UV)):

CMIN is half the capacitance of one supercapacitor. The ESR used in the expression for calculating RT is twice the end-of-life ESR. End of life is defined as when the capacitance drops to 70% of its initial value or the ESR doubles.

The Charge Profile into Matched SuperCaps graph in the LTC3625 data sheet shows the charge profile for two configurations of the LTC3625 charging a stack of two 10 F supercapacitors to 5.3 V with RPROG set to 143k. This graph, combined with the following equation, is used to determine the value of RPROG that would produce the desired charge time for the actual supercapacitors in the target application:

VC(UV) is the minimum voltage of the supercapacitors at which the DC/DC converter can produce the required output. VOUT is the output voltage of the LTC3625 in the target application (set by VSEL pin). tESTIMATE is the time required to charge from VC(UV) to the 5.3 V, as extrapolated from the charge profile curves. tRECHARGE is the desired recharge time in the target application.

Design Example

For example, say it takes 45 seconds to store the data in flash memory where the input power to the DC/DC converter is 20 W, and the VUV of the DC/DC converter is 2.7 V. A tRECHARGE of ten minutes is desired. The full charge voltage of the stack is set to 4.8 V – a good compromise between extending the life of the supercapacitor and utilizing as much of the storage capacity as possible. The components of RT are estimated: RDIST = 10 mΩ, ESR = 20 mΩ and RDS(ON) = 10 mΩ.

The resulting estimated values of RT(MAX) = 36 mΩ and RT = 40 mΩ are close enough for this stage of the design. VC(UV) is estimated at 3 V. CMIN is 128 F. Two 360 F capacitors provide an end-of-life capacitance of 126 F and ESR of 6.4 mΩ. The crossover switch consists of the LTC4412 and two P-channel MOSFETs. The RDS(ON), with a gate voltage of 2.5 V, is 10.75 mΩ (max). An RT of 26.15 mΩ is well within RT(MAX). The value for RPROG is estimated at 79.3k. The nearest standard 1% resistor is 78.7k. The data sheet suggests a 3.3 μH value for both the buck and boost inductors.

The LTC3625 contains a power-fail comparator, which is used to monitor the input power to enable the LTC4412. A voltage divider connected to the PFI pin sets the power fail trigger point (VPF) to 4.75 V.

Supercapacitor-Based Power Backup Prevents Data Loss in RAID Systems
Figure 2. Supercapacitor Backup Time Supporting a 20 W Load.

Figure 2 shows the actual backup time of the system with a 20 W load. The desired backup time is 45 seconds, whereas this system yields 76.6 seconds. The difference is due to a lower RT than estimated and an actual VUV of 2.44 V. Figure 3 shows the actual recharge time of 685 seconds compared to the 600 seconds used in the calculation, a difference due to the lower actual VUV.

Supercapacitor-Based Power Backup Prevents Data Loss in RAID Systems
Figure 3. Recharge Time After Backup.

Conclusion

Supercapacitors are replacing batteries to satisfy green initiative mandates for data centers. The LTC3625 is an efficient 1 A supercapacitor charger with automatic cell balancing that can be combined with the LTC4412 low loss PowerPath controller to produce a backup power system that protects data in storage applications.

Materials on the topic

cds.linear.com