Low-cost audio filter suppresses noise and hum

Richard Kurzrok

EDN

The low-cost composite passive filter in this Design Idea requires no dc power and can enhance the performance of audio equipment and instrumentation by rejecting power-supply hum and spurious pickup from AM, FM, and low-band VHF transmissions (Figure 1). The composite filter comprises a cascade of three simple filters: a T-section highpass filter to reject power-source hum and two π-section lowpass filters to reject spurious RF signals. As a starting point, the three filter sections present a lossless 0.01-dB Chebyshev response at a 50 Ω impedance level, but you can scale the components' values to meet other impedance requirements.

Low-cost audio filter suppresses noise and hum
Figure 1. A highpass filter and two lowpass filters help reduce or eliminate
low-frequency hum and high-frequency noise from audio signals.
 
Table 1. Components in the prototype filter
Reference
designators
Values Description
C1, C2, C4, C5 10 µF 50 V electrolytic capacitor, ±20% tolerance
C3, C6 4.7 µF 50 V electrolytic capacitor, ±20% tolerance
C7, C9 0.15 µF Polypropylene capacitor, ±2% tolerance
C8, C10 0.033 µF Polypropylene capacitor, ±2% tolerance
C11, C12 0.001 µF Polypropylene capacitor, ±2% tolerance
L1 22 mH Inductor, ±5% tolerance
L2 0.68 mH Inductor, ±10% tolerance
L3 3.85 µH Inductor, 27 turns of AWG #28 magnet wire hand-wound
on T37-2 mixture (Carbonyl E) toroidal core
S1 NA DPDT panel-mounted toggle switch
J1, J2 NA 50 W BNC panel jack
NA NA Hammond 1590H-BK die-cast aluminum enclosure

Table 1 lists the components the prototype filter uses. With the exception of inductor L3, all the components are standard values that are available off the shelf. Switch S1 provides a bypass mode that permits rapid frequency-response measurements without connection and disconnection of the prototype's BNC connectors. To construct the prototype, wire all components to a section of perforated breadboard stock supported by metal spacers that mount inside a die-cast aluminum enclosure. This method of shielded construction has proved its worth in other laboratory-accessory applications (Reference 1). Table 2 lists the filter's measured insertion loss over a range of 40 Hz to 200 MHz.

Table 2. Filter insertion loss
Frequency
(kHz)
Insertion loss
(dB)
Frequency
(MHz)
Insertion loss
(dB)
0.04 45.2 0.1 42.3
0.07 35.4 0.3 60
0.1 29.4 0.5 60
0.2 17.3 1 55.5
0.3 10.9 2 52.2
0.5 5.5 3 51.1
1 2.7 4 56.2
2 2 5 60
5 1.9 10 46.5
10 2.1 25 44
15 2.7 50 40.5
20 4.5 100 39.5
30 11.7 150 45
50 24.5 200 44

Low-cost polarized electrolytic capacitors C1 through C6 provide reasonable performance, but observe input polarity for signals with a dc component. For a modest increase in cost and assembly time, you can enhance filter performance and reproducibility by selecting the values of these capacitors to meet a 10% or better tolerance. For best results, use nonpolarized film-dielectric capacitors for C1 through C6. For noncritical applications, you can relax the tolerances for the remaining capacitors and use off-the-shelf inductors for 22-mH L1, 0.68-mH L2, and 3.9-µH L3.

Low-cost audio filter suppresses noise and hum
Figure 2.

Redesigning the filter to match the 600 Ω impedance that you find in classic audio circuits would increase the inductors' values by an order of magnitude, which would increase the inductors' dimensions and costs. An alternative design approach could use cascaded active-RC filters, which would pave the way for their inclusion into completely integrated composite-audio filters.

Reference

EDN

You may have to register before you can post comments and get full access to forum.
EMS supplier